Literature Review of Current Sustainability Assessment Frameworks and Approaches for Organizations
Sarah Farahdel, Chun Wang, Anjali Awasthi

TL;DR
This review analyzes current sustainability assessment frameworks across industries, highlighting methods, strengths, limitations, and future research directions to improve organizational sustainability practices.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive overview of SAF design approaches, evaluates various methods, and identifies gaps and opportunities for advancing sustainability assessment.
Findings
Fuzzy-AHP is a robust method for SI importance assessment.
Dynamic indices are essential but often limited by static methods.
Hybrid and multi-criteria decision-making models are recommended for future research.
Abstract
This systematic literature review explores sustainability assessment frameworks (SAFs) across diverse industries. The review focuses on SAF design approaches including the methods used for Sustainability Indicator (SI) selection, relative importance assessment, and interdependency analysis. Various methods, including literature reviews, stakeholder interviews, questionnaires, Pareto analysis, SMART approach, and adherence to sustainability standards, contribute to the complex SI selection process. Fuzzy-AHP stands out as a robust technique for assessing relative SI importance. While dynamic sustainability and performance indices are essential, methods like DEMATEL, VIKOR, correlation analysis, and causal models for interdependency assessment exhibit static limitations. The review presents strengths and limitations of SAFs, addressing gaps in design approaches and contributing to a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBusiness and Economic Development
