"Did They F***ing Consent to That?": Safer Digital Intimacy via Proactive Protection Against Image-Based Sexual Abuse
Lucy Qin, Vaughn Hamilton, Sharon Wang, Yigit Aydinalp, Marin, Scarlett, Elissa M. Redmiles

TL;DR
This paper investigates the risks of image-based sexual abuse among content creators and proposes proactive technological protections to enhance safety in digital intimacy, based on empirical interviews with European creators.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed empirical study of creators' threats and defenses, and offers concrete recommendations for technological and platform-based safety improvements.
Findings
Many creators face threats of nonconsensual distribution.
Technological mitigations are limited and underutilized.
Proactive protections can significantly improve safety.
Abstract
As many as 8 in 10 adults share intimate content such as nude or lewd images. Sharing such content has significant benefits for relationship intimacy and body image, and can offer employment. However, stigmatizing attitudes and a lack of technological mitigations put those sharing such content at risk of sexual violence. An estimated 1 in 3 people have been subjected to image-based sexual abuse (IBSA), a spectrum of violence that includes the nonconsensual distribution or threat of distribution of consensually-created intimate content (also called NDII). In this work, we conducted a rigorous empirical interview study of 52 European creators of intimate content to examine the threats they face and how they defend against them, situated in the context of their different use cases for intimate content sharing and their choice of technologies for storing and sharing such content.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection · Law, AI, and Intellectual Property · Freedom of Expression and Defamation
