Bias in Generative AI
Mi Zhou, Vibhanshu Abhishek, Timothy Derdenger, Jaymo Kim, Kannan, Srinivasan

TL;DR
This paper investigates biases in popular generative AI tools, revealing systematic gender and racial biases, as well as subtle prejudices in facial expressions and appearances, raising concerns about societal impacts.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of biases in three major generative AI models, highlighting both overt and nuanced prejudices and emphasizing the need for bias mitigation.
Findings
All models showed bias against women and African Americans.
Biases were more pronounced than societal averages or Google images.
Nuanced biases in facial expressions and appearances were identified.
Abstract
This study analyzed images generated by three popular generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools - Midjourney, Stable Diffusion, and DALLE 2 - representing various occupations to investigate potential bias in AI generators. Our analysis revealed two overarching areas of concern in these AI generators, including (1) systematic gender and racial biases, and (2) subtle biases in facial expressions and appearances. Firstly, we found that all three AI generators exhibited bias against women and African Americans. Moreover, we found that the evident gender and racial biases uncovered in our analysis were even more pronounced than the status quo when compared to labor force statistics or Google images, intensifying the harmful biases we are actively striving to rectify in our society. Secondly, our study uncovered more nuanced prejudices in the portrayal of emotions and appearances. For…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
MethodsDiffusion
