Position: Insights from Survey Methodology can Improve Training Data
Stephanie Eckman, Barbara Plank, Frauke Kreuter

TL;DR
This paper highlights how survey methodology insights can enhance training data quality for AI models, emphasizing better data collection practices to improve fairness, trustworthiness, and alignment.
Contribution
It introduces survey methodology principles to AI/ML researchers, proposing methods to improve data collection quality and reduce biases in training data.
Findings
Survey techniques can improve data accuracy for AI training.
Applying bias mitigation strategies enhances model fairness.
Collaborative research can address data collection biases.
Abstract
Whether future AI models are fair, trustworthy, and aligned with the public's interests rests in part on our ability to collect accurate data about what we want the models to do. However, collecting high-quality data is difficult, and few AI/ML researchers are trained in data collection methods. Recent research in data-centric AI has show that higher quality training data leads to better performing models, making this the right moment to introduce AI/ML researchers to the field of survey methodology, the science of data collection. We summarize insights from the survey methodology literature and discuss how they can improve the quality of training and feedback data. We also suggest collaborative research ideas into how biases in data collection can be mitigated, making models more accurate and human-centric.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Data Analysis with R
