Nanodosimetric investigation of the track structure of therapeutic carbon ion radiation. Part 2: Detailed radiation transport and track structure simulation

TL;DR

This study uses detailed simulations to investigate discrepancies in nanodosimetric measurements of therapeutic carbon ion beams, revealing the importance of detector size and accurate energy loss modeling for future experiments.

Contribution

It introduces comprehensive Geant4 and track structure simulations to explain measurement discrepancies and guides improvements in nanodosimetric experimental design.

Findings

Only a small fraction of ions traverse the nanodosimeter.

Enhanced ionization is mainly due to coincidences with missed ions.

Accurate modeling of energy loss and detector size is crucial.

Abstract

Previously reported nanodosimetric measurements of therapeutic-energy carbon ions penetrating simulated tissue have produced results that are incompatible with the predicted mean energy of the carbon ions in the nanodosimeter and previous experiments with lower energy monoenergetic beams. The purpose of this study is to explore the origin of these discrepancies. Detailed simulations using the Geant4 toolkit were performed to investigate the radiation field in the nanodosimeter and provide input data for track structure simulations, which were performed with a developed version of the PTra code. The Geant4 simulations show that with the narrow-beam geometry employed in the experiment, only a small fraction of the carbon ions traverse the nanodosimeter and their mean energy is between 12 % and 30 % lower than the targeted values. Only about one-third or less of these carbon ions hit the trigger detector. The track structure simulations indicate that the observed enhanced ionization cluster sizes are mainly due to coincidences with events in which carbon ions miss the trigger detector. In addition, the discrepancies observed for high absorber thicknesses of carbon ions traversing the target volume could be explained by assuming an increase in thickness or interaction cross-sections in the order of 1 %. The results show that even with strong collimation of the radiation field, future nanodosimetric measurements of clinical carbon ion beams will require large trigger detectors to register all events with carbon ions traversing the nanodosimeter. Energy loss calculations of the primary beam in the absorbers are insufficient and should be replaced by detailed simulations when planning such experiments. Uncertainties of the interaction cross-sections in simulation codes may shift the Bragg peak position.