On the Usability of Next-Generation Authentication: A Study on Eye Movement and Brainwave-based Mechanisms
Matin Fallahi, Patricia Arias Cabarcos, Thorsten Strufe

TL;DR
This study evaluates the usability of eye movement and brainwave-based authentication methods through empirical user testing, revealing their strengths, privacy concerns, and areas for design improvement.
Contribution
It provides an empirical comparison of brainwave and eye movement authentication mechanisms, highlighting usability, security perceptions, and privacy issues.
Findings
Both mechanisms have good usability scores (78.6-79.6 SUS).
Brainwave authentication perceived as more secure but more privacy-invasive.
Participants desire more information on security and privacy implications.
Abstract
Passwords remain a widely-used authentication mechanism, despite their well-known security and usability limitations. To improve on this situation, next-generation authentication mechanisms, based on behavioral biometric factors such as eye movement and brainwave have emerged. However, their usability remains relatively under-explored. To fill this gap, we conducted an empirical user study (n=32 participants) to evaluate three brain-based and three eye-based authentication mechanisms, using both qualitative and quantitative methods. Our findings show good overall usability according to the System Usability Scale for both categories of mechanisms, with average SUS scores in the range of 78.6-79.6 and the best mechanisms rated with an "excellent" score. Participants particularly identified brainwave authentication as more secure yet more privacy-invasive and effort-intensive compared to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsUser Authentication and Security Systems
