Double-I Watermark: Protecting Model Copyright for LLM Fine-tuning
Shen Li, Liuyi Yao, Jinyang Gao, Lan Zhang, Yaliang Li

TL;DR
This paper introduces 'Double-I watermark', a novel method for embedding verifiable watermarks into fine-tuned LLMs using backdoor data paradigms, enhancing model copyright protection during commercial fine-tuning.
Contribution
The paper proposes a new watermarking technique that embeds watermarks into LLMs during fine-tuning using instruction and input triggers, improving robustness and practicality.
Findings
Effective watermark embedding during fine-tuning.
High robustness and imperceptibility of watermarks.
Successful verification across various fine-tuning methods.
Abstract
To support various applications, a prevalent and efficient approach for business owners is leveraging their valuable datasets to fine-tune a pre-trained LLM through the API provided by LLM owners or cloud servers. However, this process carries a substantial risk of model misuse, potentially resulting in severe economic consequences for business owners. Thus, safeguarding the copyright of these customized models during LLM fine-tuning has become an urgent practical requirement, but there are limited existing solutions to provide such protection. To tackle this pressing issue, we propose a novel watermarking approach named ``Double-I watermark''. Specifically, based on the instruct-tuning data, two types of backdoor data paradigms are introduced with trigger in the instruction and the input, respectively. By leveraging LLM's learning capability to incorporate customized backdoor samples…
Peer Reviews
Decision·Submitted to ICLR 2024
- The paper is well written and comprehensible, with nice formulation that is easy to understand. - Innates difficulty of watermarking finetuned LLMs are discussed, which are important for building an algorithm. - The algorithm is simple and effective, experimental results demonstrate its watermarking capability in five essential properties. - Extensive experiments are conducted to study the effectiveness of the method in many practical usecases.
- Related works should be discussed in more detail, there are many recent watermarking techniques for LLM in the literature. - The strategy is applicable for instruction tuning only, whereas there are other ways to finetune LLM with a service provider, restricting the utility of the method in practice. - The paper should briefly introduces Fisher’s exact test, show its results and how we accept or reject a hypothesis. For example, in Table 2, the distributions on trigger set and reference set of
1. The design of reference set to complement the trigger set is interesting. 2. The overall presentation is easy to follow.
1. Lack of teachnical contribution. This method is an improvement of the naive judge question based watermarking. The overall process is still naive, which lacks theoretical or technical contents. 2. Lack of introduction of related work. Various black box model watermarking schemes have been proposed recently, including LLM watermarking, while the most recent model watermarking scheme cited in this paper is published in 2019. 3. Since the authors mention several times regarding the efficiency, i
Here are some potential strengths discussed in the paper: 1. Robustness Against Removal Attacks: The proposed "Double-I watermark" method has been designed to be robust against attacks aimed at removing the watermark, ensuring that copyright protection remains intact even under adversarial conditions. 2. Imperceptibility and Uniqueness: The watermark introduced by the method is imperceptible, meaning it doesn’t affect the model's normal functionality or output, and it is unique, allowing for cl
1. Limited Exploration of Attacks: The paper primarily focuses on second-time fine-tuning and model quantization as watermark removal attacks. The exploration of other potential attacks,such as pruning, that might be used to remove or alter the watermark seems limited. 2. Dependency on Specific Paradigms: The watermarking method relies on specific paradigms for embedding the watermark, and its effectiveness might be influenced by the choice of these paradigms, limiting its flexibility and adapt
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDigital Rights Management and Security
