The Riccati Tontine: How to Satisfy Regulators on Average
Moshe A. Milevsky, Thomas S. Salisbury

TL;DR
The paper introduces the Riccati tontine, a novel longevity risk pooling method that uses negatively correlated assets to ensure stable payouts, satisfying regulators and providing robustness during crises.
Contribution
It proposes a new accumulation-based tontine design with non-market correlated assets and provides a mathematical proof involving a Riccati differential equation.
Findings
Expected payouts are resilient during pandemics.
Assets are chosen to negatively correlate with mortality shocks.
Mathematical proof of the Riccati differential equation governing the schedule.
Abstract
This paper presents a new type of modern accumulation-based tontine, called the Riccati tontine, named after two Italians: mathematician Jacobo Riccati (b. 1676, d. 1754) and financier Lorenzo di Tonti (b. 1602, d. 1684). The Riccati tontine is yet another way of pooling and sharing longevity risk, but is different from competing designs in two key ways. The first is that in the Riccati tontine, the representative investor is expected -- although not guaranteed -- to receive their money back if they die, or when the tontine lapses. The second is that the underlying funds within the tontine are deliberately {\em not} indexed to the stock market. Instead, the risky assets or underlying investments are selected so that return shocks are negatively correlated with stochastic mortality, which will maximize the expected payout to survivors. This means that during a pandemic, for example, the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMulti-Agent Systems and Negotiation
