Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) for nuclear data evaluation
E. Alhassan, D. Rochman, G. Schnabel, and A.J. Koning

TL;DR
This paper introduces a Bayesian Model Averaging approach for nuclear data evaluation, combining multiple models weighted by their posterior probabilities to better account for model uncertainties and improve agreement with experimental data.
Contribution
It proposes a novel BMA framework for nuclear data evaluation that incorporates model uncertainties by averaging over multiple models instead of selecting a single best model.
Findings
Favorable comparison with experimental data
Improved agreement over traditional methods
Addresses model uncertainty in nuclear data evaluation
Abstract
To ensure agreement between theoretical calculations and experimental data, parameters to selected nuclear physics models, are perturbed, and fine-tuned in nuclear data evaluations. This approach assumes that the chosen set of models accurately represents the `true' distribution. Furthermore, the models are chosen globally, indicating their applicability across the entire energy range of interest. However, this approach overlooks uncertainties inherent in the models themselves. As a result, achieving satisfactory fits to experimental data within certain energy regions for specific channels becomes challenging, as the evaluation is constrained by the deficiencies of the selected models. In this work, we propose that instead of selecting globally a winning model set and proceeding with it as if it was the `true' model set, we instead, take a weighted average over multiple models within a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNuclear Physics and Applications · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering · Fault Detection and Control Systems
