Measurement Uncertainty: Relating the uncertainties of physical and virtual measurements
Simon Cramer, Tobias M\"uller, Robert H. Schmitt

TL;DR
This paper establishes a relationship between physical measurement uncertainty and the predictive uncertainty of probabilistic machine learning models, enabling virtual inspections to enhance quality management in manufacturing.
Contribution
It introduces a method to relate physical measurement uncertainty with probabilistic model uncertainty, allowing virtual inspections to replace physical sampling in quality control.
Findings
Probabilistic models provide quantifiable predictive uncertainty.
Virtual measurements can achieve 100% inspection rate.
Enhanced fault detection in complex manufacturing processes.
Abstract
In the context of industrially mass-manufactured products, quality management is based on physically inspecting a small sample from a large batch and reasoning about the batch's quality conformance. When complementing physical inspections with predictions from machine learning models, it is crucial that the uncertainty of the prediction is known. Otherwise, the application of established quality management concepts is not legitimate. Deterministic (machine learning) models lack quantification of their predictive uncertainty and are therefore unsuitable. Probabilistic (machine learning) models provide a predictive uncertainty along with the prediction. However, a concise relationship is missing between the measurement uncertainty of physical inspections and the predictive uncertainty of probabilistic models in their application in quality management. Here, we show how the predictive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsScientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
