
TL;DR
This paper critically examines the concept of a word, clarifying misconceptions, exploring current theories, and discussing implications for linguistic research and experimental design.
Contribution
It provides a clear analysis of what constitutes a word, addressing misconceptions and proposing a more accurate conceptual framework for linguistic studies.
Findings
Identifies common misconceptions about what a word is
Highlights the importance of precise definitions for experimental design
Suggests current theories better capture the nature of words
Abstract
In order to design strong paradigms for isolating lexical access and semantics, we need to know what a word is. Surprisingly few linguists and philosophers have a clear model of what a word is, even though words impact basically every aspect of human life. Researchers that regularly publish academic papers about language often rely on outdated, or inaccurate, assumptions about wordhood. This short pedagogical document outlines what the lexicon is most certainly not (though is often mistakenly taken to be), what it might be (based on current good theories), and what some implications for experimental design are.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsClassical Philosophy and Thought · Lexicography and Language Studies
