Disclosure and Mitigation of Gender Bias in LLMs
Xiangjue Dong, Yibo Wang, Philip S. Yu, James Caverlee

TL;DR
This paper introduces an indirect probing framework to detect and analyze gender bias in large language models, revealing biases even without explicit stereotypes and proposing mitigation strategies.
Contribution
It presents a novel indirect probing method for uncovering implicit gender biases in LLMs and evaluates effective mitigation techniques.
Findings
All tested LLMs exhibit explicit and implicit gender bias.
Larger models and aligned models tend to amplify bias.
Mitigation methods are effective without explicit gender mentions.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) can generate biased responses. Yet previous direct probing techniques contain either gender mentions or predefined gender stereotypes, which are challenging to comprehensively collect. Hence, we propose an indirect probing framework based on conditional generation. This approach aims to induce LLMs to disclose their gender bias even without explicit gender or stereotype mentions. We explore three distinct strategies to disclose explicit and implicit gender bias in LLMs. Our experiments demonstrate that all tested LLMs exhibit explicit and/or implicit gender bias, even when gender stereotypes are not present in the inputs. In addition, an increased model size or model alignment amplifies bias in most cases. Furthermore, we investigate three methods to mitigate bias in LLMs via Hyperparameter Tuning, Instruction Guiding, and Debias Tuning. Remarkably, these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBusiness Law and Ethics
