Reviewer2: Optimizing Review Generation Through Prompt Generation
Zhaolin Gao, Kiant\'e Brantley, Thorsten Joachims

TL;DR
Reviewer2 is a two-stage framework that enhances automated review generation by explicitly modeling review aspects, resulting in more detailed and comprehensive reviews, supported by a large annotated dataset for future research.
Contribution
This paper introduces Reviewer2, a novel two-stage review generation method that explicitly models review aspects, improving detail and coverage over prior approaches.
Findings
Generated reviews are more detailed and diverse.
The dataset includes 27k papers and 99k annotated reviews.
Reviewer2 outperforms existing automated review methods.
Abstract
Recent developments in LLMs offer new opportunities for assisting authors in improving their work. In this paper, we envision a use case where authors can receive LLM-generated reviews that uncover weak points in the current draft. While initial methods for automated review generation already exist, these methods tend to produce reviews that lack detail, and they do not cover the range of opinions that human reviewers produce. To address this shortcoming, we propose an efficient two-stage review generation framework called Reviewer2. Unlike prior work, this approach explicitly models the distribution of possible aspects that the review may address. We show that this leads to more detailed reviews that better cover the range of aspects that human reviewers identify in the draft. As part of the research, we generate a large-scale review dataset of 27k papers and 99k reviews that we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEducational Technology and Assessment · Scientific Computing and Data Management
