Approximating Competitive Equilibrium by Nash Welfare
Jugal Garg, Yixin Tao, L\'aszl\'o A. V\'egh

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between competitive equilibrium and Nash welfare maximization in divisible goods allocation, introducing Gale-substitute utilities and showing approximate CE guarantees for certain utility classes.
Contribution
It introduces Gale-substitute utility functions and demonstrates their significance in approximating CE through Nash welfare maximization, including new classes like generalized network utilities.
Findings
Allocations maximizing Nash welfare approximate CE with strong guarantees for Gale-substitutes.
Gale-substitutes include SPLC and Leontief-free utilities, where computing CE is PPAD-hard.
Every CE achieves at least 69% of maximum Nash welfare, tight bound.
Abstract
We study the relationship between two central concepts in the allocation of divisible goods: competitive equilibrium (CE) and allocations that maximize Nash welfare, i.e., allocations where the weighted geometric mean of the utilities is maximal. When agents have homogeneous concave utility functions, these concepts coincide: the classical Eisenberg-Gale convex program that maximizes Nash welfare over feasible allocations yields a competitive equilibrium. However, they diverge for non-homogeneous utilities. From a computational perspective, maximizing Nash welfare amounts to solving a convex program for any concave utility functions, whereas computing CE becomes PPAD-hard already for separable piecewise linear concave (SPLC) utilities. We introduce the concept of Gale-substitute utility functions, an analogue of the weak gross substitutes (WGS) property for the so-called Gale demand…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic theories and models · Game Theory and Voting Systems
