Distal Interference: Exploring the Limits of Model-Based Continual Learning
Heinrich van Deventer, Anna Sergeevna Bosman

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limitations of model-based continual learning, highlighting how distal interference affects neural networks, and introduces ABEL-Spline, a novel architecture with theoretical guarantees to mitigate this issue.
Contribution
The paper introduces ABEL-Spline, a new neural network architecture with polynomial complexity that offers guarantees against distal interference in continual learning.
Findings
ABEL-Spline can approximate any continuous function.
ABEL-Spline demonstrates theoretical properties in experiments.
Weak guarantees of distal interference mitigation are insufficient for continual learning.
Abstract
Continual learning is the sequential learning of different tasks by a machine learning model. Continual learning is known to be hindered by catastrophic interference or forgetting, i.e. rapid unlearning of earlier learned tasks when new tasks are learned. Despite their practical success, artificial neural networks (ANNs) are prone to catastrophic interference. This study analyses how gradient descent and overlapping representations between distant input points lead to distal interference and catastrophic interference. Distal interference refers to the phenomenon where training a model on a subset of the domain leads to non-local changes on other subsets of the domain. This study shows that uniformly trainable models without distal interference must be exponentially large. A novel antisymmetric bounded exponential layer B-spline ANN architecture named ABEL-Spline is proposed that can…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
