Training-Free Message Passing for Learning on Hypergraphs
Bohan Tang, Zexi Liu, Keyue Jiang, Siheng Chen, Xiaowen Dong

TL;DR
This paper introduces a training-free message passing module for hypergraph neural networks that reduces training time while maintaining competitive performance, enabling efficient learning on complex data structures.
Contribution
The authors propose TF-MP-Module, a precomputable message passing method that decouples hypergraph structure from training, improving efficiency and robustness in hypergraph neural networks.
Findings
TF-HNN is more training-efficient than existing HNNs.
TF-HNN utilizes as much information as existing HNNs for node features.
TF-HNN is robust against oversmoothing and long-range interactions.
Abstract
Hypergraphs are crucial for modelling higher-order interactions in real-world data. Hypergraph neural networks (HNNs) effectively utilise these structures by message passing to generate informative node features for various downstream tasks like node classification. However, the message passing module in existing HNNs typically requires a computationally intensive training process, which limits their practical use. To tackle this challenge, we propose an alternative approach by decoupling the usage of hypergraph structural information from the model learning stage. This leads to a novel training-free message passing module, named TF-MP-Module, which can be precomputed in the data preprocessing stage, thereby reducing the computational burden. We refer to the hypergraph neural network equipped with our TF-MP-Module as TF-HNN. We theoretically support the efficiency and effectiveness of…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2025 Poster
1. The paper is well-structured and easy to follow. 2. The summary of hypergraph neural networks is comprehensive, particularly with the insights provided in Table 1 and the related analysis.
Major weaknesses: 1 Proposition 4.2 shows the similarity between the proposed method and APPNP [1], yet the paper does not cite APPNP. Specifically, Eq (6) and Eq (14) appear to apply APPNP after performing clique expansion on the hypergraph. This connection should be discussed more thoroughly, referencing APPNP's Eq (7) and Eq (8) to clarify the relationship and implications of this similarity in the context of hypergraph learning. While the experimental results demonstrate superiority, this o
1. The paper makes a significant contribution by addressing the issue of high computational complexity of Hypergraph learning algorithms. 2. The proposed solution, TF-HNN is novel and elegant, which decouples the processing of structural information from the model training stage. 3. Authors provide a strong theoretical foundation for TF-HNN, the unified framework presented in the paper links all the popular HNN approaches, which shows that TF-HNN is designed by keeping many existing methodolog
I do not see any weak points in this paper. This is a very well written paper, with significant contributions. Please refer to the questions sections for the questions I have.
1. The design of the proposed method is very interesting. 2. The proposed method is both highly efficient and effective. 3. The paper is clearly written and well-organized, making the research easy to follow.
It appears that there is an issue regarding the hyperparameters. The combinations of hyperparameters used in the experiments shown in Table 13 and Table 14 are quite diverse. For example, the value of alpha ranges from 0.05, 0.15, 0.3, 0.6, 0.65, to 0.7. The learning rate also varies, with values like 0.0006, 0.0001, 0.005, 0.001, and 0.0002. What method was used for hyperparameter search? Additionally, upon reviewing the attached anonymous GitHub link, it appears that the optimal hyperparameter
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Neural Networks
