Astronomical Image Processing Benchmark Study for Various Telescope Aperture Shapes
Jyotika Roychowdhury, Kevin Derby, Daewook Kim

TL;DR
This study evaluates how different telescope aperture shapes affect image simulation and deconvolution accuracy, emphasizing the importance of aperture-specific optimization in astronomical imaging.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of six telescope aperture shapes and their impact on PSF, image quality, and deconvolution results using synthetic star fields.
Findings
Aperture shape significantly influences PSF and image quality.
Brightness magnitude affects deconvolution accuracy.
Optimized pipelines are necessary for different aperture types.
Abstract
We explore the impact of different telescope apertures on the image simulation and deconvolution processes within the context of a synthetic star field. Using HCIPy and Python programming, we modelled six telescope apertures namely Circular, Hexagonal, Elliptical (with horizontal and vertical major axes), segmented hexagonal (JWST), and obstructed circular (HST). We calculated Point Spread Functions (PSFs) for each aperture, incorporating surface shape-induced wavefront aberrations, convolved them with a synthetic star field spanning a range of brightness magnitudes, and introduced photon and detector noise layers to simulate realistic imaging conditions. Subsequent deconvolution using the Richardson-Lucy algorithm allowed for an analysis of deconvolution accuracy based on parameters like average distance between stars and differences in the number of stars between original and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation · Calibration and Measurement Techniques · Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing
