Fine-Tuned Language Models Generate Stable Inorganic Materials as Text
Nate Gruver, Anuroop Sriram, Andrea Madotto, Andrew Gordon Wilson, C. Lawrence Zitnick, Zachary Ulissi

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that fine-tuning large language models on atomistic data can reliably generate stable inorganic materials, outperforming existing models in predicting metastable structures and capturing crystal symmetries.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach of fine-tuning large language models for material generation, showing high physical constraint adherence and improved metastability prediction.
Findings
90% of generated structures obey physical constraints
49% of generated materials are metastable, nearly double previous models
Language models capture crystal symmetries better with increased scale
Abstract
We propose fine-tuning large language models for generation of stable materials. While unorthodox, fine-tuning large language models on text-encoded atomistic data is simple to implement yet reliable, with around 90% of sampled structures obeying physical constraints on atom positions and charges. Using energy above hull calculations from both learned ML potentials and gold-standard DFT calculations, we show that our strongest model (fine-tuned LLaMA-2 70B) can generate materials predicted to be metastable at about twice the rate (49% vs 28%) of CDVAE, a competing diffusion model. Because of text prompting's inherent flexibility, our models can simultaneously be used for unconditional generation of stable material, infilling of partial structures and text-conditional generation. Finally, we show that language models' ability to capture key symmetries of crystal structures improves with…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2024 poster
- Application on the material science domain is interesting - The adaptation of LLMs for the material science is reasonable - Empirical results are promising
- The technical contribution is relatively limited, where the tokenization, the prompt design and the objectives for pertaining are all well studied in the past. - Since the nature of the material data is quite different compared to the natural language data, I’m wondering whether the pretrained LLAMA2 is offering any additional value. It would be helpful if one can show the performance with and without loading the pretrained checkpoint from LLAMA2 tasks.
1. the author got good performance in the shown benchmarks. 2. the method seems solid since it has been widely used in many other domains.
1. While one anticipates good performance from LLMs on standard evaluation metrics, especially with the likes of LLaMA-70B, the critical matter lies in the practical application in experiments. 2. Given that LLMs can sometimes produce hallucinations, it would be beneficial to comprehensively evaluate this behavior in large models, rather than merely touching upon it in the limitations section. Presenting failure examples could offer valuable insights. 3. Regarding Figure 2, could the authors e
* The paper is well-motivated, addressing the limitations of existing computational materials databases and the potential of generative models for materials discovery. * The proposed approach of fine-tuning large language models on text-encoded atomistic data is novel and unorthodox, offering a new perspective on materials generation. * The paper is well-written, providing clear background information and a thorough explanation of the proposed method.
Related concerns are discussed in the questions section.
Code & Models
Videos
Taxonomy
TopicsModular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Machine Learning in Materials Science
MethodsDiffusion
