A quantitative analysis of knowledge-learning preferences in large language models in molecular science
Pengfei Liu, Jun Tao, Zhixiang Ren

TL;DR
This paper introduces a multi-modal benchmark and analysis framework to quantify how large language models learn and adapt to different data modalities in molecular science, enhancing understanding of their knowledge acquisition.
Contribution
It proposes a novel benchmark and a statistical approach to analyze modality compatibility and knowledge preferences in large language models for molecular applications.
Findings
Identified key data modalities for specific molecular tasks
Developed a statistically interpretable method for knowledge mapping
Provided insights into model-data modality compatibility
Abstract
Deep learning has significantly advanced molecular modeling and design, enabling efficient understanding and discovery of novel molecules. In particular, large language models (LLMs) introduce a fresh research paradigm to tackle scientific problems from a natural language processing (NLP) perspective. LLMs significantly enhance our understanding and generation of molecules, often surpassing existing methods with their capabilities to decode and synthesize complex molecular patterns. However, two key issues remain: how to quantify the match between model and data modalities and how to identify the knowledge-learning preferences of models. To address these challenges, we propose a multi-modal benchmark, named ChEBI-20-MM, and perform 1263 experiments to assess the model's compatibility with data modalities and knowledge acquisition. Through the modal transition probability matrix, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling
