Prediction Horizon Requirements for Automated Driving: Optimizing Safety, Comfort, and Efficiency
Manuel Mu\~noz S\'anchez, Chris van der Ploeg, Robin Smit, Jos, Elfring, Emilia Silvas, Ren\'e van de Molengraft

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different prediction horizons in trajectory prediction affect automated vehicle safety, comfort, and efficiency, providing guidelines for optimal horizon lengths based on specific performance criteria.
Contribution
It introduces a framework to determine minimum and optimal prediction horizons for AVs, based on comprehensive simulation experiments with a risk-based trajectory planner.
Findings
A 1.6-second horizon prevents pedestrian collisions.
7-8 seconds optimize vehicle efficiency.
Up to 15 seconds improve passenger comfort.
Abstract
Predicting the movement of other road users is beneficial for improving automated vehicle (AV) performance. However, the relationship between the time horizon associated with these predictions and AV performance remains unclear. Despite the existence of numerous trajectory prediction algorithms, no studies have been conducted on how varying prediction lengths affect AV safety and other vehicle performance metrics, resulting in undefined horizon requirements for prediction methods. Our study addresses this gap by examining the effects of different prediction horizons on AV performance, focusing on safety, comfort, and efficiency. Through multiple experiments using a state-of-the-art, risk-based predictive trajectory planner, we simulated predictions with horizons up to 20 seconds. Based on our simulations, we propose a framework for specifying the minimum required and optimal prediction…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVehicle emissions and performance
