Transfer Learning With Densenet201 Architecture Model For Potato Leaf Disease Classification

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates that transfer learning with DenseNet201 significantly improves potato leaf disease classification accuracy, achieving over 92% accuracy on test data, aiding rapid and precise disease detection.

Contribution

The study evaluates the effectiveness of DenseNet201 with transfer learning for potato leaf disease classification, outperforming traditional methods.

Findings

Achieved 92.5% accuracy on test data.

Optimal model with dropout 0.1 and Adam optimizer.

High training and validation accuracy of 99.5% and 95.2%.

Abstract

Potato plants are plants that are beneficial to humans. Like other plants in general, potato plants also have diseases; if this disease is not treated immediately, there will be a significant decrease in food production. Therefore, it is necessary to detect diseases quickly and precisely so that disease control can be carried out effectively and efficiently. Classification of potato leaf disease can be done directly. Still, the symptoms cannot always explain the type of disease that attacks potato leaves because there are many types of diseases with symptoms that look the same. Humans also have deficiencies in determining the results of identification of potato leaf disease, so sometimes the results of identification between individuals can be different. Therefore, the use of Deep Learning for the classification process of potato leaf disease is expected to shorten the time and have a high classification accuracy. This study uses a deep learning method with the DenseNet201 architecture. The choice to use the DenseNet201 algorithm in this study is because the model can identify important features of potato leaves and recognize early signs of emerging diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the transfer learning method with the DenseNet201 architecture in increasing the classification accuracy of potato leaf disease compared to traditional classification methods. This study uses two types of scenarios, namely, comparing the number of dropouts and comparing the three optimizers. This test produces the best model using dropout 0.1 and Adam optimizer with an accuracy of 99.5% for training, 95.2% for validation, and 96% for the confusion matrix. In this study, using data testing, as many as 40 images were tested into the model that has been built. The test results on this model resulted in a new accuracy for classifying potato leaf disease, namely 92.5%.