Reducing Optimism Bias in Incomplete Cooperative Games
Filip \'Uradn\'ik, David Sychrovsk\'y, Jakub \v{C}ern\'y, Martin, \v{C}ern\'y

TL;DR
This paper introduces a framework to strategically reveal coalition values in cooperative games to reduce players' over-optimistic expectations, improving decision-making efficiency in AI applications.
Contribution
It proposes methods to optimize the sequence of revealing coalition values, minimizing optimism bias with theoretical analysis and empirical validation.
Findings
Developed analytical tools for optimistic game completions
Created algorithms for offline and online coalition value revelation
Demonstrated improved expectation alignment in practical scenarios
Abstract
Cooperative game theory has diverse applications in contemporary artificial intelligence, including domains like interpretable machine learning, resource allocation, and collaborative decision-making. However, specifying a cooperative game entails assigning values to exponentially many coalitions, and obtaining even a single value can be resource-intensive in practice. Yet simply leaving certain coalition values undisclosed introduces ambiguity regarding individual contributions to the collective grand coalition. This ambiguity often leads to players holding overly optimistic expectations, stemming from either inherent biases or strategic considerations, frequently resulting in collective claims exceeding the actual grand coalition value. In this paper, we present a framework aimed at optimizing the sequence for revealing coalition values, with the overarching goal of efficiently…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDigital Mental Health Interventions · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
