Challenges in Training PINNs: A Loss Landscape Perspective
Pratik Rathore, Weimu Lei, Zachary Frangella, Lu Lu, Madeleine Udell

TL;DR
This paper investigates the training challenges of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) from a loss landscape perspective, proposing new optimization strategies and analyzing the impact of differential operators on training difficulty.
Contribution
It introduces a novel second-order optimizer NysNewton-CG and analyzes the benefits of combining first- and second-order methods for PINNs.
Findings
Adam+L-BFGS outperforms individual optimizers.
NysNewton-CG significantly improves PINN training.
Ill-conditioning from differential operators affects loss landscape.
Abstract
This paper explores challenges in training Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), emphasizing the role of the loss landscape in the training process. We examine difficulties in minimizing the PINN loss function, particularly due to ill-conditioning caused by differential operators in the residual term. We compare gradient-based optimizers Adam, L-BFGS, and their combination Adam+L-BFGS, showing the superiority of Adam+L-BFGS, and introduce a novel second-order optimizer, NysNewton-CG (NNCG), which significantly improves PINN performance. Theoretically, our work elucidates the connection between ill-conditioned differential operators and ill-conditioning in the PINN loss and shows the benefits of combining first- and second-order optimization methods. Our work presents valuable insights and more powerful optimization strategies for training PINNs, which could improve the utility of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiomedical and Engineering Education
MethodsAdam
