A survey on robustness in trajectory prediction for autonomous vehicles
Jeroen Hagenus, Frederik Baymler Mathiesen, Julian F. Schumann, Arkady, Zgonnikov

TL;DR
This survey reviews the current landscape of robustness in trajectory prediction for autonomous vehicles, highlighting challenges, strategies, and promising methods to enhance safety and reliability.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive categorization and assessment of existing approaches to evaluate and improve robustness in trajectory prediction models.
Findings
Many promising methods for increasing robustness identified
Robustness strategies include data slicing, perturbation, and model adjustments
Addressing overfitting is crucial for safe autonomous driving
Abstract
Autonomous vehicles rely on accurate trajectory prediction to inform decision-making processes related to navigation and collision avoidance. However, current trajectory prediction models show signs of overfitting, which may lead to unsafe or suboptimal behavior. To address these challenges, this paper presents a comprehensive framework that categorizes and assesses the definitions and strategies used in the literature on evaluating and improving the robustness of trajectory prediction models. This involves a detailed exploration of various approaches, including data slicing methods, perturbation techniques, model architecture changes, and post-training adjustments. In the literature, we see many promising methods for increasing robustness, which are necessary for safe and reliable autonomous driving.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Robotic Path Planning Algorithms · Vehicle License Plate Recognition
