No More Trade-Offs. GPT and Fully Informative Privacy Policies
Przemys{\l}aw Pa{\l}ka, Marco Lippi, Francesca Lagioia and, R\=uta Liepi\c{n}a, Giovanni Sartor

TL;DR
The paper demonstrates that GPT models can effectively interpret fully comprehensive privacy policies, supporting the idea that laws should mandate detailed policies despite potential reductions in conciseness.
Contribution
It introduces a new privacy policy format and provides experimental evidence that GPT can understand it well, advocating for more comprehensive policies mandated by law.
Findings
GPT 3.5 and 4 perform well with the new privacy policy format
Fully comprehensive policies improve user understanding
Legal requirements should enforce detailed privacy policies
Abstract
The paper reports the results of an experiment aimed at testing to what extent ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 is able to answer questions regarding privacy policies designed in the new format that we propose. In a world of human-only interpreters, there was a trade-off between comprehensiveness and comprehensibility of privacy policies, leading to the actual policies not containing enough information for users to learn anything meaningful. Having shown that GPT performs relatively well with the new format, we provide experimental evidence supporting our policy suggestion, namely that the law should require fully comprehensive privacy policies, even if this means they become less concise.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
