The 1/3-conjectures for domination in cubic graphs
Paul Dorbec (GREYC), Michael Antony Henning (UJ)

TL;DR
This paper advances the understanding of domination in cubic graphs by proving two conjectures related to the domination number being at most one-third of the vertices under specific girth and bipartite conditions.
Contribution
The paper proves Verstraete's conjecture for cubic graphs with girth at least 6 excluding 7- and 8-cycles, and Kostochka's conjecture for bipartite cubic graphs without 4- or 8-cycles.
Findings
Verstraete's conjecture holds for cubic graphs with girth ≥6 excluding 7- and 8-cycles.
Kostochka's conjecture holds for bipartite cubic graphs without 4- and 8-cycles.
Provides new bounds on domination numbers under specific girth and bipartite constraints.
Abstract
A set S of vertices in a graph G is a dominating set of G if every vertex not in S is adjacent to a vertex in S . The domination number of G, denoted by (G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set in G. In a breakthrough paper in 2008, L{\"o}wenstein and Rautenbach proved that if G is a cubic graph of order n and girth at least 83, then (G) n/3. A natural question is if this girth condition can be lowered. The question gave birth to two 1/3-conjectures for domination in cubic graphs. The first conjecture, posed by Verstraete in 2010, states that if G is a cubic graph on n vertices with girth at least 6, then (G) n/3. The second conjecture, first posed as a question by Kostochka in 2009, states that if G is a cubic, bipartite graph of order n, then (G) n/3. In this paper, we prove Verstraete's conjecture when there is no 7-cycle…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Japanese History and Culture
