AI prediction of cardiovascular events using opportunistic epicardial adipose tissue assessments from CT calcium score

TL;DR

This study develops novel radiomic features from CT scans to improve prediction of cardiovascular events related to epicardial adipose tissue, showing significant enhancement over traditional measures.

Contribution

Introduces 'fat-omics', a set of 148 handcrafted radiomic features, for better EAT analysis and MACE risk prediction, outperforming traditional fat assessments.

Findings

Traditional features had limited predictive power (C-index ~0.55).

Fat-omics features improved prediction (C-index=0.69).

High-risk features relate to fat inflammation and heterogeneity.

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have used basic epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) assessments (e.g., volume and mean HU) to predict risk of atherosclerosis-related, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Objectives: Create novel, hand-crafted EAT features, 'fat-omics', to capture the pathophysiology of EAT and improve MACE prediction. Methods: We segmented EAT using a previously-validated deep learning method with optional manual correction. We extracted 148 radiomic features (morphological, spatial, and intensity) and used Cox elastic-net for feature reduction and prediction of MACE. Results: Traditional fat features gave marginal prediction (EAT-volume/EAT-mean-HU/ BMI gave C-index 0.53/0.55/0.57, respectively). Significant improvement was obtained with 15 fat-omics features (C-index=0.69, test set). High-risk features included volume-of-voxels-having-elevated-HU-[-50, -30-HU] and HU-negative-skewness, both of which assess high HU, which as been implicated in fat inflammation. Other high-risk features include kurtosis-of-EAT-thickness, reflecting the heterogeneity of thicknesses, and EAT-volume-in-the-top-25%-of-the-heart, emphasizing adipose near the proximal coronary arteries. Kaplan-Meyer plots of Cox-identified, high- and low-risk patients were well separated with the median of the fat-omics risk, while high-risk group having HR 2.4 times that of the low-risk group (P<0.001). Conclusion: Preliminary findings indicate an opportunity to use more finely tuned, explainable assessments on EAT for improved cardiovascular risk prediction.