Predictability and Randomness
Lenhart K. Schubert

TL;DR
This paper explores the relationship between algorithmic randomness and probabilistic sequence prediction, establishing conditions under which sequences are considered unpredictable or random, and linking these concepts to Solomonoff's prediction theory.
Contribution
It demonstrates that sequences are random iff unpredictable, relates randomness to optimal predictors, and connects algorithmic randomness with Solomonoff's prediction framework.
Findings
Sequences are random iff unpredictable.
Universal predictors are optimal for all sequences under weak criteria.
Law of large numbers applies to sequences random relative to computable distributions.
Abstract
Algorithmic theories of randomness can be related to theories of probabilistic sequence prediction through the notion of a predictor, defined as a function which supplies lower bounds on initial-segment probabilities of infinite sequences. An infinite binary sequence is called unpredictable iff its initial-segment "redundancy" remains sufficiently low relative to every effective predictor . A predictor which maximizes the initial-segment redundancy of a sequence is called optimal for that sequence. It turns out that a sequence is random iff it is unpredictable. More generally, a sequence is random relative to an arbitrary computable distribution iff the distribution is itself an optimal predictor for the sequence. Here "random" can be taken in the sense of Martin-L\"{o}f by using weak criteria of effectiveness, or in the sense of Schnorr by using stronger…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection · Risk and Portfolio Optimization
