Checking the $^8$Be anomaly with a two-arm electron positron pair spectrometer
Tran The Anh, Tran Dinh Trong, Attila J. Krasznahorkay, Attila, Krasznahorkay, J\'ozsef Moln\'ar, Zolt\'an Pintye, Nguyen Ai Viet, Nguyen The, Nghia, Do Thi Khanh Linh, Bui Thi Hoa, Le Xuan Chung, Nguyen Tuan Anh

TL;DR
This study replicates a previous experiment suggesting a potential new particle, confirming the anomaly at one resonance energy while refuting it at others, using a different spectrometer setup for validation.
Contribution
It provides an independent verification of the $^8$Be anomaly with a different spectrometer, strengthening the evidence for the potential new particle X17.
Findings
Confirmed the anomaly at E_x=18.15 MeV resonance.
Did not observe the anomaly at E_x=17.6 MeV resonance.
No anomaly detected at E_p=800 keV off resonance energies.
Abstract
We have repeated the experiment performed recently by Krasznahorkay et al., (Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 042501 (2016)), which may indicate a new particle called X17 in the literature. In order to get a reliable, and independent result, we used a different type of electron-positron pair spectrometer which have a more simple acceptance/efficiency as a function of the correlation angle, but the other conditions of the experiment were very similar to the published ones. We could confirm the presence of the anomaly measured at the E=18.15 MeV resonance, and also confirm their absence at the E=17.6 MeV resonance, and at E= 800 keV off resonance energies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMuon and positron interactions and applications · Atomic and Molecular Physics · X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
