Should agentic conversational AI change how we think about ethics? Characterising an interactional ethics centred on respect
Lize Alberts, Geoff Keeling, Amanda McCroskery

TL;DR
This paper advocates for an interactional ethics framework for agentic conversational AI, emphasizing respect and pragmatic social factors over traditional output-focused criteria, to ensure ethical behavior in social interactions.
Contribution
It introduces an interactional approach to AI ethics that considers relational and situational factors, addressing overlooked social interaction risks in agentic LLM systems.
Findings
Highlights importance of pragmatics in ethical AI interactions
Proposes practical guidelines for respectful AI behavior
Identifies new social risks in agentic AI interactions
Abstract
With the growing popularity of conversational agents based on large language models (LLMs), we need to ensure their behaviour is ethical and appropriate. Work in this area largely centres around the 'HHH' criteria: making outputs more helpful and honest, and avoiding harmful (biased, toxic, or inaccurate) statements. Whilst this semantic focus is useful when viewing LLM agents as mere mediums or output-generating systems, it fails to account for pragmatic factors that can make the same speech act seem more or less tactless or inconsiderate in different social situations. With the push towards agentic AI, wherein systems become increasingly proactive in chasing goals and performing actions in the world, considering the pragmatics of interaction becomes essential. We propose an interactional approach to ethics that is centred on relational and situational factors. We explore what it means…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training · Focus
