Trustworthy human-centric based Automated Decision-Making Systems
Marcelino Cabrera, Carlos Cruz, Pavel Novoa-Hern\'andez and, David A. Pelta, Jos\'e Luis Verdegay

TL;DR
This paper examines the ethical, societal, and regulatory challenges of deploying trustworthy human-centric Automated Decision-Making Systems, emphasizing the importance of transparency and regulation to prevent misuse and unintended consequences.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of the implications, ethical considerations, and necessary regulations for human-centric ADS in modern society.
Findings
Highlighting risks of misuse and unintended consequences
Emphasizing need for transparency and regulation
Discussing ethical considerations in ADS deployment
Abstract
Automated Decision-Making Systems (ADS) have become pervasive across various fields, activities, and occupations, to enhance performance. However, this widespread adoption introduces potential risks, including the misuse of ADS. Such misuse may manifest when ADS is employed in situations where it is unnecessary or when essential requirements, conditions, and terms are overlooked, leading to unintended consequences. This research paper presents a thorough examination of the implications, distinctions, and ethical considerations associated with digitalization, digital transformation, and the utilization of ADS in contemporary society and future contexts. Emphasis is placed on the imperative need for regulation, transparency, and ethical conduct in the deployment of ADS.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Information and Cyber Security
