On the error control of invariant causal prediction

TL;DR

This paper enhances invariant causal prediction by integrating less conservative error control methods like false discovery rate and true discovery bounds, enabling more causal discoveries from heterogeneous data.

Contribution

It reformulates invariant causal prediction as a multiple testing problem and applies the e-Closure principle for improved error guarantees.

Findings

Improved causal discovery with false discovery rate control.

Derived simultaneous true discovery bounds without extra assumptions.

Demonstrated practical benefits through simulations and real data.

Abstract

Invariant causal prediction provides a useful framework for identifying causal predictors of a response using heterogeneous data from multiple environments. One valuable property of the original invariant causal prediction method is that it guarantees no false causal discoveries with high probability. Such a guarantee, however, can be overly conservative in some applications, resulting in few or no causal discoveries. This raises a natural question: can invariant causal prediction be equipped with less conservative error guarantees and thereby extract more causal information from the data? In this paper, we address this question by focusing on two widely used and more liberal guarantees: false discovery rate control and simultaneous true discovery bounds. A key step in our approach is to reformulate invariant causal prediction as a multiple testing problem. We then adopt the e-Closure principle to obtain (simultaneous) false discovery rate control, together with new p-to-e calibrators tailored to this setting. We also derive simultaneous true discovery bounds via closed testing, which provide additional causal information without requiring extra assumptions and retain all discoveries from the original invariant causal prediction method. Through simulations and a real data application on educational attainment of teenagers in the United States, we show that these more liberal error control guarantees can improve the practical usefulness of invariant causal prediction.