On the Parameter Estimation of Sinusoidal Models for Speech and Audio Signals
George P. Kafentzis

TL;DR
This paper compares three sinusoidal models for speech and audio signal parameter estimation, analyzing their accuracy and robustness across synthetic and real signals, and suggests combining their strengths for improved audio analysis.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of the standard SM, EDSM, and eaQHM models, highlighting their respective advantages and proposing a hybrid approach for better audio signal processing.
Findings
eaQHM outperforms EDS in medium-to-large window analysis
EDSM yields higher reconstruction for small window sizes
Future work may combine adaptivity and robustness of the models
Abstract
In this paper, we examine the parameter estimation performance of three well-known sinusoidal models for speech and audio. The first one is the standard Sinusoidal Model (SM), which is based on the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). The second is the Exponentially Damped Sinusoidal Model (EDSM) which has been proposed in the last decade, and utilizes a subspace method for parameter estimation, and finally the extended adaptive Quasi-Harmonic Model (eaQHM), which has been recently proposed for AM-FM decomposition, and estimates the signal parameters using Least Squares on a set of basis function that are adaptive to the local characteristics of the signal. The parameter estimation of each model is briefly described and its performance is compared to the others in terms of signal reconstruction accuracy versus window size on a variety of synthetic signals and versus the number of sinusoids on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpeech and Audio Processing · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Blind Source Separation Techniques
MethodsSparse Evolutionary Training · Network On Network
