Maximum Likelihood Estimation under the Emax Model: Existence, Geometry and Efficiency
Giacomo Aletti, Nancy Flournoy, Caterina May, Chiara Tommasi

TL;DR
This paper investigates the existence and properties of maximum likelihood estimates in the Emax dose-response model, providing new theoretical insights, explicit solutions for certain designs, and strategies to address estimation failures.
Contribution
It offers a comprehensive analysis of MLE existence in the Emax model, derives explicit MLEs for three-point designs, and proposes methods to overcome estimation issues.
Findings
Exact MLE derived for three-point design
Identification of scenarios where MLE fails
Firth's modification improves estimation in problematic cases
Abstract
This study focuses on the estimation of the Emax dose-response model, a widely utilized framework in clinical trials, agriculture, and environmental experiments. Existing challenges in obtaining maximum likelihood estimates (MLE) for model parameters are often ascribed to computational issues but, in reality, stem from the absence of a MLE. Our contribution provides a new understanding and control of all the experimental situations that practitioners might face, guiding them in the estimation process. We derive the exact MLE for a three-point experimental design and we identify the two scenarios where the MLE fails. To address these challenges, we propose utilizing Firth's modified score, providing its analytical expression as a function of the experimental design. Through a simulation study, we demonstrate that, in one of the problematic cases, the Firth modification yields a finite…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimal Experimental Design Methods · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
