Cross-calibration of atomic sensors for pressure metrology

TL;DR

This paper presents a cross-calibration method for atomic sensors used in pressure metrology, comparing different sensor atoms and background gases to improve measurement accuracy without relying on theoretical models.

Contribution

It introduces a model-free cross-calibration approach for atomic sensors, enabling validation of theoretical and empirical methods in pressure measurement.

Findings

Results are consistent with theoretical predictions within 3.5(5)%

Demonstrates a model-free calibration method for atomic sensors

Highlights the utility of cross-calibration in validating pressure measurements

Abstract

Atomic sensors have shown great promise for density and pressure metrology in the high, ultra-high, and extremely-high vacuum regimes. Specifically, the density of background gas particles in vacuum can be determined by measuring the collision rate between the particles and an ensemble of sensor atoms. This requires preparing the sensor atoms in a particular quantum state, observing the rate of changes of that state, and using the cross section coefficient for state-changing collisions to convert the rate into a corresponding density. The cross section can be known by various methods including by quantum scattering calculations using an ansatz for the interaction potential between the collision pair, by measurements of the post-collision sensor-atom momentum recoil distribution, or by empirical calibration of the sensor atom at a known density. Identifying systematic errors in the results of these methods can be aided by direct comparisons between them. Alternatively, measurements of different sensor atoms exposed to the same background gas offers another point of comparison free of the systematic errors inherent in creating a background gas at a known density. Here, we present such measurements for two sensor atoms, $^{87}$Rb and $^6$Li, and a variety of atomic and molecular background gases including H$_2$, N$_2$, Ar, Ne, Kr, and Xe. We find results consistent with, yet statistically different at the level of 3.5(5)%, from recent theoretical and experiment measurements. This work demonstrates a model-free method for transferring the primacy of one atomic standard to another sensor atom and highlights the utility of sensor-atom cross-calibration experiments to check the validity of direct measurements and theoretical predictions.