Hazards from Increasingly Accessible Fine-Tuning of Downloadable Foundation Models
Alan Chan, Ben Bucknall, Herbie Bradley, David Krueger

TL;DR
The paper discusses how the increased accessibility of fine-tuning foundation models can lead to greater hazards, emphasizing the need for mitigation strategies amidst uncertain risks.
Contribution
It analyzes the implications of accessible fine-tuning, highlighting hazards, potential mitigations, and the balance of benefits and risks.
Findings
Accessible fine-tuning may facilitate malicious use
It complicates oversight of dangerous capabilities
Mitigation measures are urgently needed
Abstract
Public release of the weights of pretrained foundation models, otherwise known as downloadable access \citep{solaiman_gradient_2023}, enables fine-tuning without the prohibitive expense of pretraining. Our work argues that increasingly accessible fine-tuning of downloadable models may increase hazards. First, we highlight research to improve the accessibility of fine-tuning. We split our discussion into research that A) reduces the computational cost of fine-tuning and B) improves the ability to share that cost across more actors. Second, we argue that increasingly accessible fine-tuning methods may increase hazard through facilitating malicious use and making oversight of models with potentially dangerous capabilities more difficult. Third, we discuss potential mitigatory measures, as well as benefits of more accessible fine-tuning. Given substantial remaining uncertainty about…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
