Exploring Sound vs Vibration for Robust Fault Detection on Rotating Machinery

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new benchmark dataset for sound and vibration data from rotating machinery, proposes a deep learning method for sound-based fault detection, and demonstrates its robustness and cost-effectiveness compared to vibration-based methods.

Contribution

The study provides the first deep learning approach for sound-based fault detection and offers a comprehensive benchmark dataset for multi-condition machinery fault analysis.

Findings

Sound-based fault detection is more robust than vibration-based methods.

Sound sensors are cost-effective and sensor-location independent.

Sound-based methods achieve comparable detection performance to vibration-based ones.

Abstract

Robust and real-time detection of faults on rotating machinery has become an ultimate objective for predictive maintenance in various industries. Vibration-based Deep Learning (DL) methodologies have become the de facto standard for bearing fault detection as they can produce state-of-the-art detection performances under certain conditions. Despite such particular focus on the vibration signal, the utilization of sound, on the other hand, has been neglected whilst only a few studies have been proposed during the last two decades, all of which were based on a conventional ML approach. One major reason is the lack of a benchmark dataset providing a large volume of both vibration and sound data over several working conditions for different machines and sensor locations. In this study, we address this need by presenting the new benchmark Qatar University Dual-Machine Bearing Fault Benchmark dataset (QU-DMBF), which encapsulates sound and vibration data from two different motors operating under 1080 working conditions overall. Then we draw the focus on the major limitations and drawbacks of vibration-based fault detection due to numerous installation and operational conditions. Finally, we propose the first DL approach for sound-based fault detection and perform comparative evaluations between the sound and vibration over the QU-DMBF dataset. A wide range of experimental results shows that the sound-based fault detection method is significantly more robust than its vibration-based counterpart, as it is entirely independent of the sensor location, cost-effective (requiring no sensor and sensor maintenance), and can achieve the same level of the best detection performance by its vibration-based counterpart. With this study, the QU-DMBF dataset, the optimized source codes in PyTorch, and comparative evaluations are now publicly shared.