Neural Operators for Boundary Stabilization of Stop-and-go Traffic

TL;DR

This paper presents neural operator-based methods for boundary control of traffic flow modeled by PDEs, offering faster and simpler control design with practical stability guarantees, outperforming traditional PI controllers.

Contribution

Introduces neural operator schemes for PDE boundary control in traffic systems, reducing complexity and computation time compared to classical backstepping methods.

Findings

Neural operator controllers outperform PI controllers in speed and stability.

NO-based methods achieve practical stability under certain approximation conditions.

Simulations show NO controllers are faster and comparably effective to backstepping control.

Abstract

This paper introduces a novel approach to PDE boundary control design using neural operators to alleviate stop-and-go instabilities in congested traffic flow. Our framework leverages neural operators to design control strategies for traffic flow systems. The traffic dynamics are described by the Aw-Rascle-Zhang (ARZ) model, which comprises a set of second-order coupled hyperbolic partial differential equations (PDEs). Backstepping method is widely used for boundary control of such PDE systems. The PDE model-based control design can be time-consuming and require intensive depth of expertise since it involves constructing and solving backstepping control kernels. To overcome these challenges, we present two distinct neural operator (NO) learning schemes aimed at stabilizing the traffic PDE system. The first scheme embeds NO-approximated gain kernels within a predefined backstepping controller, while the second one directly learns a boundary control law. The Lyapunov analysis is conducted to evaluate the stability of the NO-approximated gain kernels and control law. It is proved that the NO-based closed-loop system is practical stable under certain approximation accuracy conditions in NO-learning. To validate the efficacy of the proposed approach, simulations are conducted to compare the performance of the two neural operator controllers with a PDE backstepping controller and a Proportional Integral (PI) controller. While the NO-approximated methods exhibit higher errors compared to the backstepping controller, they consistently outperform the PI controller, demonstrating faster computation speeds across all scenarios. This result suggests that neural operators can significantly expedite and simplify the process of obtaining boundary controllers in traffic PDE systems.