Requiring negative probabilities from the thing researched, else that thing does not exist, is insufficient ground for any conclusion

TL;DR

The paper argues that the Bell experiment's reliance on negative probabilities to prove the existence of hidden variables is flawed, rendering its conclusions meaningless due to the absurdity of negative probabilities.

Contribution

It critically examines the assumptions behind Bell experiments, challenging the necessity of negative probabilities and questioning the validity of their conclusions about hidden variables.

Findings

Bell experiment requires negative probabilities for hidden variables.

Negative probabilities are considered absurd and invalidate the experiment's conclusions.

The paper questions the existence of hidden variables based on these assumptions.

Abstract

It is demonstrated that the statistical method of the famous Aspect - Bell experiment requires negative probability densities and negative probabilities from "the thing" researched, else that thing doesn't exist. The thing refers here to Einstein hidden variables. This requirement is absurd, and therefore the results from such experiments are meaningless.