Nearly Equitable Allocations Beyond Additivity and Monotonicity
Siddharth Barman, Umang Bhaskar, Yeshwant Pandit, and Soumyajit Pyne

TL;DR
This paper investigates the existence and computation of nearly equitable allocations (EQx) beyond additive and monotonic valuations, providing new algorithms and hardness results for various valuation classes.
Contribution
It proves EQx allocations always exist for monotone valuations and offers polynomial-time algorithms for certain subclasses, while establishing hardness results for non-monotone cases.
Findings
EQx allocations always exist for monotone valuations.
Polynomial-time algorithms are available for weakly well-layered valuations.
Determining existence of EQx is NP-hard for non-monotone valuations.
Abstract
Equitability (EQ) in fair division requires that items be allocated such that all agents value the bundle they receive equally. With indivisible items, an equitable allocation may not exist, and hence we instead consider a meaningful analog, EQx, that requires equitability up to any item. EQx allocations exist for monotone, additive valuations. However, if (1) the agents' valuations are not additive or (2) the set of indivisible items includes both goods and chores (positively and negatively valued items), then prior to the current work it was not known whether EQx allocations exist or not. We study both the existence and efficient computation of EQx allocations. (1) For monotone valuations (not necessarily additive), we show that EQx allocations always exist. Also, for the large class of weakly well-layered valuations, EQx allocations can be found in polynomial time. Further, we…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Auction Theory and Applications · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
