Measurement-driven neural-network training for integrated magnetic tunnel junction arrays

TL;DR

This paper demonstrates a measurement-driven, statistics-aware training method for neural networks implemented on magnetic tunnel junction arrays, effectively compensating for hardware defects and variations to maintain high accuracy.

Contribution

It introduces a robust, statistics-aware training approach that accounts for hardware non-idealities, improving neural network performance on defective magnetic tunnel junction arrays.

Findings

Hardware-aware training recovers performance degraded by defects.

Statistics-aware training maintains accuracy across diverse defective dies.

Achieves 2% error increase on MNIST compared to ideal software models.

Abstract

The increasing scale of neural networks needed to support more complex applications has led to an increasing requirement for area- and energy-efficient hardware. One route to meeting the budget for these applications is to circumvent the von Neumann bottleneck by performing computation in or near memory. An inevitability of transferring neural networks onto hardware is that non-idealities such as device-to-device variations or poor device yield impact performance. Methods such as hardware-aware training, where substrate non-idealities are incorporated during network training, are one way to recover performance at the cost of solution generality. In this work, we demonstrate inference on hardware neural networks consisting of 20,000 magnetic tunnel junction arrays integrated on a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor chips that closely resembles market-ready spin transfer-torque magnetoresistive random access memory technology. Using 36 dies, each containing a crossbar array with its own non-idealities, we show that even a small number of defects in physically mapped networks significantly degrades the performance of networks trained without defects and show that, at the cost of generality, hardware-aware training accounting for specific defects on each die can recover to comparable performance with ideal networks. We then demonstrate a robust training method that extends hardware-aware training to statistics-aware training, producing network weights that perform well on most defective dies regardless of their specific defect locations. When evaluated on the 36 physical dies, statistics-aware trained solutions can achieve a mean misclassification error on the MNIST dataset that differs from the software-baseline by only 2 %. This statistics-aware training method could be generalized to networks with many layers that are mapped to hardware suited for industry-ready applications.