Is MgB$_2$ a superconductor?
E.F. Talantsev, V.S. Minkov, V. Ksenofontov, S.L. Bud'ko, M.I. Eremets

TL;DR
This paper critically examines claims about hydrogen-rich compounds and argues that MgB$_2$ is not a superconductor based on model analysis and experimental data interpretation.
Contribution
It challenges previous assertions by applying the Hirsch-Marsiglio model to MgB$_2$, demonstrating it does not exhibit superconductivity.
Findings
MgB$_2$ is not a superconductor according to the model.
Previous claims about hydrides' superconductivity are based on flawed data analysis.
The application of the model reveals inconsistencies in earlier interpretations.
Abstract
Hirsch and Marsiglio, in their recent publication (J. Supercond. Nov. Mag. 35, 3141-3145 (2022)), assert that experimental data on the trapping of magnetic flux by hydrogen-rich compounds clearly demonstrate the absence of superconductivity in hydrides at high pressures. We argue that this assertion is incorrect, as it relies on the wrong model coupled with selective manipulations (hide/delete) of calculated datasets and ignores the reference measurements after the release of pressure. A critical examination of the authors' claim of having performed fitting of experimental data to the model reveals that, in fact, the authors conducted simulations where all free parameters were fixed. Importantly, an application of the Hirsch-Marsiglio model to MgB leads to the conclusion that it is not a superconductor.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSuperconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research · Hydrogen Storage and Materials
