Is Ego Status All You Need for Open-Loop End-to-End Autonomous Driving?
Zhiqi Li, Zhiding Yu, Shiyi Lan, Jiahan Li, Jan Kautz, Tong Lu, Jose, M. Alvarez

TL;DR
This paper critically examines open-loop end-to-end autonomous driving models, revealing dataset limitations and proposing new evaluation metrics and baselines to better assess planning quality and perception utilization.
Contribution
It introduces a new metric for trajectory-road adherence, analyzes the reliance on ego status in models, and provides a simple competitive baseline without perception annotations.
Findings
nuScenes dataset leads to under-utilization of perception information.
Current metrics may bias evaluation of planning quality.
A simple baseline achieves competitive results without perception data.
Abstract
End-to-end autonomous driving recently emerged as a promising research direction to target autonomy from a full-stack perspective. Along this line, many of the latest works follow an open-loop evaluation setting on nuScenes to study the planning behavior. In this paper, we delve deeper into the problem by conducting thorough analyses and demystifying more devils in the details. We initially observed that the nuScenes dataset, characterized by relatively simple driving scenarios, leads to an under-utilization of perception information in end-to-end models incorporating ego status, such as the ego vehicle's velocity. These models tend to rely predominantly on the ego vehicle's status for future path planning. Beyond the limitations of the dataset, we also note that current metrics do not comprehensively assess the planning quality, leading to potentially biased conclusions drawn from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Older Adults Driving Studies
