Calibrated Generalized Bayesian Inference
David T. Frazier, Christopher Drovandi, Robert Kohn

TL;DR
This paper introduces a simple, effective method for accurate uncertainty quantification in Bayesian inference under model misspecification and for generalized posteriors, applicable to various models including generalized linear and doubly intractable models.
Contribution
The authors propose replacing the standard posterior with an alternative that reliably captures uncertainty, improving inference in misspecified or approximate models.
Findings
Accurately quantifies uncertainty in misspecified models
Applicable to likelihood-based and loss-based posteriors
Demonstrated on generalized linear and doubly intractable models
Abstract
We propose a simple approach that provides accurate uncertainty quantification for Bayesian inference in misspecified or approximate models, and for generalized (Gibbs) posteriors. While existing solutions in this context are based on explicit Gaussian approximations or post-processing procedures, we demonstrate that correct uncertainty quantification can be achieved by substituting the usual posterior with an intuitively appealing alternative that conveys the same information. This solution applies to both likelihood-based and loss-based posteriors, and is formally demonstrated to reliably quantify uncertainty. This new approach is demonstrated through a range of examples, including generalized linear models, and doubly intractable models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses · Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
