Gaussian-basis many-body theory calculations of positron binding to negative ions and atoms

TL;DR

This study employs a Gaussian-basis many-body theory to calculate positron binding energies to negative ions and atoms, revealing the importance of correlations such as virtual-positronium formation in enabling binding.

Contribution

The paper introduces a Gaussian-basis many-body approach to accurately compute positron binding energies, including complex correlation effects, for negative ions and atoms, with results aligning well with other advanced methods.

Findings

Correlations enhance binding energies by 25-50% for negative ions.

Binding energies for atoms are 10-30% larger than some previous calculations.

The method achieves good agreement with other high-level computational approaches.

Abstract

Positron binding energies in the negative ions H$^-$, F$^-$, Cl$^-$ and Br$^-$, and the closed-shell atoms Be, Mg, Zn and Ca, are calculated via a many-body theory approach developed by the authors [J.~Hofierka \emph{et al.} Nature~{\bf 608}, 688-693 (2022)]. Specifically, the Dyson equation is solved using a Gaussian basis, with the positron self energy constructed from three infinite classes of diagrams that account for the strong positron-atom correlations that characterise the system including the positron-induced polarization of the electron cloud, screening of the electron-positron Coulomb interaction, virtual-positronium formation and electron-hole and positron-hole interactions. For the negative ions, binding occurs at the static level of theory, and the correlations are found to enhance the binding energies by $\sim$25--50\%, yielding results in good agreement with ($\lesssim$5\% larger than) calculations from a number of distinct methods. For the atoms, for which binding is enabled exclusively by correlations, most notably virtual-Ps formation, the binding energies are found to be of similar order to (but $\sim$10--30\% larger than) relativistic coupled-cluster calculations of [C. Harabati, V.~A.~Dzuba and V.~V. Flambaum, Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 89}, 022517 (2014)], both of which are systematically larger than stochastic variational calculations of [M.~Bromley and J.~Mitroy, Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 73} (2005); J.~Mitroy, J.~At.~Mol.~Sci.~{\bf 1}, 275 (2010)].