Benchmarking bias: Expanding clinical AI model card to incorporate bias reporting of social and non-social factors
Carolina A. M. Heming, Mohamed Abdalla, Shahram Mohanna, Monish, Ahluwalia, Linglin Zhang, Hari Trivedi, MinJae Woo, Benjamin Fine, Judy, Wawira Gichoya, Leo Anthony Celi, Laleh Seyyed-Kalantari

TL;DR
This paper advocates for expanding clinical AI model cards to include comprehensive bias reporting, covering social and non-social factors like disease, anatomy, and instruments, to enhance safety and transparency.
Contribution
It introduces an expanded framework for clinical AI model cards that incorporates non-social bias factors alongside social ones, addressing a gap in current reporting practices.
Findings
Proposes a comprehensive bias reporting framework for clinical AI models.
Highlights the importance of including non-social factors such as disease and instrument effects.
Aims to improve safety and transparency in clinical AI deployment.
Abstract
Clinical AI model reporting cards should be expanded to incorporate a broad bias reporting of both social and non-social factors. Non-social factors consider the role of other factors, such as disease dependent, anatomic, or instrument factors on AI model bias, which are essential to ensure safe deployment.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
