Leveraging Generative AI for Clinical Evidence Summarization Needs to Ensure Trustworthiness
Gongbo Zhang, Qiao Jin, Denis Jered McInerney, Yong Chen, Fei Wang,, Curtis L. Cole, Qian Yang, Yanshan Wang, Bradley A. Malin, Mor Peleg, Byron, C. Wallace, Zhiyong Lu, Chunhua Weng, Yifan Peng

TL;DR
This paper discusses the potential and challenges of using generative AI, like large language models, for summarizing medical evidence in healthcare, emphasizing the importance of trustworthiness and accountability.
Contribution
It provides a perspective on the trustworthiness issues of generative AI in medical evidence summarization, highlighting the need for accountability, fairness, and inclusivity.
Findings
Generative AI can assist in medical evidence summarization.
Trustworthiness and fairness are critical challenges.
Developing accountable models is essential for clinical use.
Abstract
Evidence-based medicine promises to improve the quality of healthcare by empowering medical decisions and practices with the best available evidence. The rapid growth of medical evidence, which can be obtained from various sources, poses a challenge in collecting, appraising, and synthesizing the evidential information. Recent advancements in generative AI, exemplified by large language models, hold promise in facilitating the arduous task. However, developing accountable, fair, and inclusive models remains a complicated undertaking. In this perspective, we discuss the trustworthiness of generative AI in the context of automated summarization of medical evidence.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies · Machine Learning in Healthcare · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
