Non-uniform Bid-scaling and Equilibria for Different Auctions: An Empirical Study
Yuan Deng, Jieming Mao, Vahab Mirrokni, Yifeng Teng, Song Zuo

TL;DR
This empirical study compares auction formats like FPA, GSP, and VCG under uniform and non-uniform bid-scaling, revealing their relative performance and the impact of bid-scaling strategies on welfare and profit.
Contribution
It provides the first empirical analysis of how non-uniform bid-scaling affects different auction formats in autobidding environments.
Findings
FPA outperforms GSP and VCG in welfare and profit.
Non-uniform bid-scaling reduces welfare in FPA and GSP.
VCG's performance is unaffected by bid-scaling levels.
Abstract
In recent years, the growing adoption of autobidding has motivated the study of auction design with value-maximizing auto-bidders. It is known that under mild assumptions, uniform bid-scaling is an optimal bidding strategy in truthful auctions, e.g., Vickrey-Clarke-Groves auction (VCG), and the price of anarchy for VCG is . However, for other auction formats like First-Price Auction (FPA) and Generalized Second-Price auction (GSP), uniform bid-scaling may not be an optimal bidding strategy, and bidders have incentives to deviate to adopt strategies with non-uniform bid-scaling. Moreover, FPA can achieve optimal welfare if restricted to uniform bid-scaling, while its price of anarchy becomes when non-uniform bid-scaling strategies are allowed. All these price of anarchy results have been focused on welfare approximation in the worst-case scenarios. To complement theoretical…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAuction Theory and Applications · Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing · Art History and Market Analysis
