Investigating the Use of Traveltime and Reflection Tomography for Deep Learning-Based Sound-Speed Estimation in Ultrasound Computed Tomography

TL;DR

This paper explores how traveltime and reflection tomography can be combined in deep learning models to efficiently and accurately estimate tissue sound-speed maps in ultrasound computed tomography, improving upon traditional methods.

Contribution

It introduces a dual-input CNN approach using traveltime and reflection tomography for high-resolution SOS reconstruction, demonstrating improved accuracy and clinical applicability.

Findings

Dual-channel CNN outperforms single-input models in SOS accuracy

Achieved low NRMSE and high SSIM on clinical breast data

Enhanced tumor detection performance with combined modalities

Abstract

Ultrasound computed tomography (USCT) quantifies acoustic tissue properties such as the speed-of-sound (SOS). Although full-waveform inversion (FWI) is an effective method for accurate SOS reconstruction, it can be computationally challenging for large-scale problems. Deep learning-based image-to-image learned reconstruction (IILR) methods can offer computationally efficient alternatives. This study investigates the impact of the chosen input modalities on IILR methods for high-resolution SOS reconstruction in USCT. The selected modalities are traveltime tomography (TT) and reflection tomography (RT), which produce a low-resolution SOS map and a reflectivity map, respectively. These modalities have been chosen for their lower computational cost relative to FWI and their capacity to provide complementary information: TT offers a direct SOS measure, while RT reveals tissue boundary information. Systematic analyses were facilitated by employing a virtual USCT imaging system with anatomically realistic numerical breast phantoms. Within this testbed, a supervised convolutional neural network (CNN) was trained to map dual-channel (TT and RT images) to a high-resolution SOS map. Single-input CNNs were trained separately using inputs from each modality alone (TT or RT) for comparison. The accuracy of the methods was systematically assessed using normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). For tumor detection performance, receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed. The dual-channel IILR method was also tested on clinical human breast data. Ensemble average of the NRMSE, SSIM, and PSNR evaluated on this clinical dataset were 0.2355, 0.8845, and 28.33 dB, respectively.