Scalable Diffusion for Materials Generation
Sherry Yang, KwangHwan Cho, Amil Merchant, Pieter Abbeel, Dale, Schuurmans, Igor Mordatch, Ekin Dogus Cubuk

TL;DR
This paper introduces UniMat, a scalable diffusion-based model for generating complex crystal structures, improving over previous graph-based methods and aligning better with downstream material discovery goals.
Contribution
The paper presents UniMat, a unified crystal representation and diffusion model that scales to large systems and enhances material generation quality and stability prediction.
Findings
UniMat outperforms previous graph-based approaches in generating high-fidelity crystal structures.
Proposes new metrics linking generation quality to material stability and discovery.
Conditional generation with UniMat scales to millions of structures, surpassing current search methods.
Abstract
Generative models trained on internet-scale data are capable of generating novel and realistic texts, images, and videos. A natural next question is whether these models can advance science, for example by generating novel stable materials. Traditionally, models with explicit structures (e.g., graphs) have been used in modeling structural relationships in scientific data (e.g., atoms and bonds in crystals), but generating structures can be difficult to scale to large and complex systems. Another challenge in generating materials is the mismatch between standard generative modeling metrics and downstream applications. For instance, common metrics such as the reconstruction error do not correlate well with the downstream goal of discovering stable materials. In this work, we tackle the scalability challenge by developing a unified crystal representation that can represent any crystal…
Peer Reviews
Decision·ICLR 2024 poster
1. The paper is well-written and easy to follow. The theoretical background is well explained and clear. 2. The idea of modeling the atom movement for material generation using diffusion models and the denoising process is interesting and novel to the best of my knowledge. I am not an expert in materials science, so I am not sure about the method novelty here.
1. The utilized benchmarks seem to be saturated with values close to 100% performance. The performance gain is marginal and therefore could be a random improvement. Also, in some of the cases, the previous work has already achieved 100%, so there is no room for improvement. 2. There is another work that uses diffusion models for the same task on the same datasets [a]. Although [a] uses diffusion models in a different way compared to this work, it has similar or better performance in some cases.
- The proposed method is shown to be better than previous methods quantitatively in most cases (Table 1). - The proposed method generates crystal structures closer to those in the test set than the baseline method CDVAE.
- There is no innovation in the diffusion model and the AI part. This paper just uses the standard diffusion model, and the conditional diffusion model to generate crystal structures. - I understand this paper may be a good paper for material science. Another venue related to material science, physics or chemistry may be a good venue to maximize the impact of this work. This paper presented at ICLR may have a small number of audience. In addition, Sec. 2.3, evaluating the generated materials u
The paper's approach is innovative, offering a fresh perspective on materials generation. UniMat is the standout contribution of this work. It offers an elegant solution to the representation of materials, particularly in the context of the periodic table. The concept of sparsity in representation, with adaptability to chemical system size, is novel. The utilization of diffusion models together with UniMat represents a clever combination of ideas. The generated materials of diffusion models ar
The quality improvement of the paper is significant, especially for scaling up to large materials datasets. However, it would be helpful to provide a more in-depth analysis of the quantitative metrics and benchmarks used to make these comparisons.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning in Materials Science · Topic Modeling
MethodsDiffusion
